Loading…
Could you just change to the GRX 48/31 cranks/chainrings for some more top end speed with the 11-40 or 11-46 cassette? ...I haven’t tried it, but there’s a post on Reddit: "I'm currently running 48/31 with 11-46 11 speed. I have the 1x deraileur with the m8000 sgs deraileur cage plates. Shifts flawlessly."
For all kinds of reasons the small/small combination should be avoided. I don't intentionally use any cog in the small half of my cassette with the small chainring.
For all kinds of reasons the small/small combination should be avoided. I don't intentionally use any cog in the small half of my cassette with the small chainring.
Absolutely, but it is good to have for the unintentional moment. I follow a 3-cog rule, but my current 46-30 chainrings, and 11-40 rear XT (with a Wolftooth Tanpan) does allow for the complete range. Over the winter, I will switch to 48/32 with 11-46, per suggestions on this tread.
I have a 2x9 setup which I made sure works in all combinations for safety reasons. After getting old and suffering a couple of semi-major crashes I no longer ride fast so I don't need small cogs. Also I can climb the steepest hills I encounter with a 1:1 ratio so I don't need a tiny chainring. My gearing is pretty simple since I need only about half the range in the thread title.
My "problem" is that I am still fairly powerful but even back when I was very powerful (FTP > 300 Watts before getting a mitral valve infection requiring open-heart surgery), I prefer to never have my cadence go below 70 RPM. Since I encounter climbs with double-digit grades, I need a very wide range.
When I was in my 40s I could do only about 210 W for an hour on a rowing machine but I could climb double-digit grades in a 42-19 gear standing at a low cadence. 30 years later I'm much slower but still don't need really low gears. Even with a long top tube and 130 mm stem I tend to lift the front wheel climbing a steep grade seated so I usually stand.
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.