Miracle CX 535 (chinese) carbon frame

I am looking for a carbon frame that will take 38's to 40's with mud.   I have no experience with Chinese carbon frames, and have been pouring over the internet.  

I am curious if anyone here has done a build using Miracle's frame(s) and/or ridden them for any period of time. 

This is the model I am looking at
http://www.miraclebikes.com/products/path0143/path0163/TopbestcyclocrossbikescarbonframeFlatmountcyclocro03004352/

I have requested a quote...guessing deliver US @ around $550 ish for frame and fork

What bike are you riding now...and comfortable on? Do you know your preferred stack and reach? The frame you linked has a pretty short front end for a 'gravel' bike. Long and low would be another term to describe it. The reach (length) of the 56cm is ~1mm longer than the 60cm of the Salsa Warbird (383.5 vs 392.2mm). The front end of the Warbird is 80mm taller.

Anybody wanting to go this Miracle Bike route had better be used to riding long and low. It has the fit/sizing of a performance/race oriented road bike. While my Warbird example is a somewhat tall (front end) bike, the more popular multi-hour adventure type bikes all seem to have higher front ends.

Yeah. Those Miracle frames are long and low. Ouch!

Have a look at the Carbonda gravel frameset. Shorter in the reach, and taller in the stack.
There's a writeup on one here on the Bikes forum.

More thoughts on this frame (with pics) over on the WeightWeenies forum.

I almost purchased one, but its not quite high enough in the stack for me. Reach was great, though.

The low stack height is in part due the frame's very minimal bottom bracket drop, especially in the smaller sizes. \nNot great gravel geometry.

Thank you very much for the responses.

Comparing the Reach to the Ridley X-trail carbon (56 to 56).... the reaches are nearly identical....so you have me confused there.

Looking at the stack and wheelbase ..... yep, thank you .... stack is A LOT shorter on the china frame.

THANKS AGAIN, saved me some trouble