Loading…
For a XC 29er tire we recommend 3-4 ounces (89-118ml) of sealant. The amount of sealant can be adjusted based on the volume of the tire. More sealant can also be added if a tire is porous and difficult to seal. For road and cyclocross tires, we recommend 2 ounces (60ml).
spectastic wrote:I'd double it.
from stans FAQ:How much sealant should I use?
For a XC 29er tire we recommend 3-4 ounces (89-118ml) of sealant. The amount of sealant can be adjusted based on the volume of the tire. More sealant can also be added if a tire is porous and difficult to seal. For road and cyclocross tires, we recommend 2 ounces (60ml).
ljsmith wrote:Good grief Koyote, you really think 2 oz. of sealant is enough for a 40mm tire? Why would anyone think the 2 oz. that is good for a 23mm road tire is enough for a 40mm gravel tire. If all you are trying to do is seal the tire, 2 oz is enough. But if you actually want some puncture protection 3-4oz is a better idea. Especially if you don’t want to constantly refill your tires as the sealant dries up. And if you are concerned about the extra weight of the sealant you have issues. And since it seems to matter to you, I’ve been running tubeless for over 10 years.
spectastic wrote:it also said you should check your sealant every 6 months or so, to make sure the solvent hasn't evaporated or something. they make dip sticks for this purpose, but I'm thinking if you can hear it go splash inside, it should still be ok.
CC wrote:
Yeps, but this depends on climate also, like pawnee implied. I live in the Southwest (Vegas) and have had to add ~2 oz every 3 months.
CC wrote:
Yeps, but this depends on climate also, like pawnee implied. I live in the Southwest (Vegas) and have had to add ~2 oz every 3 months.
spectastic wrote:on the note of weight, the extra sealants add minimal additional rotational weight, as it settles in a puddle that perpetually settles to the bottom of the tire as the tire rotates. the sealant is more evenly distributed around the tire when you pick up speed. but considering rotational weight is most pertinent for acceleration, which in this case, assumes that you're starting from a slower speed, weight of the sealant in the wheel matters less than weight of the rim. something to consider
bnystrom wrote:That's complete BS. At any speed above a crawl, the sealant is going to be spun out to the outermost part of the tires, which is the worst case scenario in terms of rotating weight. The one saving grace is that rotationally, the sealant can move somewhat independently from the tire, though it still has to be accelerated linearly.
That said, we're typically only talking 25-50 grams (1-2 ounces), so the difference is not huge.
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.