Loading…
https://cyclingtips.com/2020/05/gravel-bike-vs-mountain-bike-are-you-better-off-with-a-hardtail-mtb/
You can also run a suspension fork on many gravel bikes, even on my Salsa Warbird, for example!
https://bikerumor.com/2019/11/18/niner-mcr-9-rdo-full-suspension-gravel-bike-review/
https://bikepacking.com/bikes/salsa-cutthroat-v2-review/
Is a rigid, drop bar mtb. I has a suspension corrected fork though, so you could run it with a suspension fork.
Here is a picture of Lael Wilcox on her drop bar mtb:
(from this article: https://www.renehersecycles.com/blog/ )
You can also run a suspension fork on many gravel bikes, even on my Salsa Warbird, for example!
TrailRunnah wrote:
Herein lies the conundrum. I think the terrain I’m on is unique and my reasons for being there are unique too. I’m very literal and when I heard “Gravel Bike” I was thinking a bike that could handle the roughness of these mountain roads, but that isn’t what I think most folks use them for....
Zurichman wrote:
Chas since you know a lot more about bikes than me I have this ? and not to hijack his post. I am really satisfied with my Roker Comp now as my gravel race bike. I am retiring in 1-2 years and want to buy a retirement bike. I am looking for a bike that will handle some single track or nastier courses than my Roker is probably good for. I am probably willing to spend. $4000 - $5000 or $5000 - $6000. Somebody suggested the Specialized Epic Expert as that she said is what most folks ride the Leadville 100 on. I know Niner has some stuff out there and also have hear of Marin. I looked up the Specialized bike and it list weight is 24.5 lbs. I am not going to buy a bike that heavy. Is there a bike like I am looking for in the 18-20 lb range and I know nothing between the difference in a hard tail and a bike that has a shock. Any suggestions would be welcome so I can do some reviews. Now or maybe next time this year would be probably a nice time to buy a last years leftover bike.
Thanks
Zman
Zman, I’ve been riding the same mountain bike for 25+ years, and boy have things changed in the MTB world. Everything new seems to be a “trail” bike these days. Hard tails cross country bikes are not the focus, even though they are great for people who don’t ride in bike parks in the mountains.
Front and rear suspension are going to add weight, so 18-20lbs is going to tend to rule those out. Rear suspension is nice, but a thud buster works great if you are looking for comfort. I doubt that you or I will be doing much air time where you really need the suspension – although a rear suspension obviously helps when flying through rock gardens and roots at speed.
It seems that every year, mountain bikes get longer/lower/slacker – making them easier to go fast down hill (and sometimes making it hard to go up hill). It does shock me that a 30lb mountain bike is rather normal these days.
Generally cross country hard tails are considered too “twitchy” and difficult to ride (because they are not long/low/slack enough), although that would be perfect for gravel rides and single track that is not too technical. My Olympic winning mountain bike from the mid ‘90s would be considered a nightmare on single track today, but works amazingly well as a gravel bike.
I would think any of the top end mountain bikes from Trek, Specialized, RDO, Niner, Canyon, etc would be relatively comparable. I don’t think you’ll find a hard tail under 20lbs, add a couple lbs if you want a rear suspension.
When I am doing a gravel ride with the local cross country racers (on hardtails), I find I can climb better than them because my bike and tires/wheels are a lot lighter, and my top speed is a lot faster because of the gearing (all of which helps as they are a lot faster and younger than me, lol).
Mountain bikes tend to be categorized by how much travel they have, but they really should be rated by how much of their focus is climbing vs descending.
Cmtgravel wrote:Here's my take on this: You're spoiled by suspension! Haha! Not meant as an insult. Those of us old enough to remember learning to mtn bike on fully rigid bikes basically riding through the woods (no such thing as groomed trails then) learned how to choose line and use a LOT of "body english" to get through. And of course, being youngsters then, we didn't mind being bumped and jostled around as much. I stopped mtn biking in the late 90's (had a hardtail by then), so i never really unlearned those skills. When i started gravel biking several years ago, those skills slowly began to return . But now, in my 50's, a rough gravel ride leaves me sore for days! I do have to say that last fall i rode a full squish mtn bike for the first ever time, with hydro brakes and dropper post, on groomed trails, and it was heaven! So i would just say stick with it, learn some new skills, avoid the really rough stuff, and you'll be fine. A gravel bike is really just an old-timey rigid mtn bike w drop bars!
chas wrote:
It really has to be a frame designed for a suspension - i.e. the head tube has to be short enough where you could add 50mm of travel in there (Ridged this might mean you are going to have an extra 50mm of clearance above your tire in your fork). I can't do that on my bike for example.
A Salsa Warbird is built to accept a gravel suspension fork, a Salsa Cutthroat is built to takea mtb fork. And so are many other gravel bikes, check the spec pages.
TrailRunnah wrote:
Ha! Let me clarify. I rode a Hoo-Koo-E-Koo old school bike up until about 6 years ago with c-lever brakes. So, my threshold of a rough ride isn’t too awfully low.
Most of my mountain biking has been in the foothills on wooded, rooty trails. What I’m riding now is a different animal. Not tight winding and rooty trails, but rough, washed out gravel roads with loads of climbs and downhills where you hit 25-30mpg and there is no choosing a line on a gravel road with washboards and ruts.
Also note, since I was in college in 90’ and wiped out on a road bike I haven’t been on anything but a mountain bike and haven’t touched pavement since. It was a bad crash. So, I really think air pressure and tire width is the key here - but I want to test it before buying a new bike and “hoping” that it works.
TrailRunnah wrote:@smoothmoose What are the gravel roads like where you're riding? Pretty beat up, washboardish? 2.2" tires at what pressure? Do you have photo of your setup?I weight about 150-155lbs depending on gear and ride with 22/25psi on the 2.2"
TrailRunnah wrote:@smoothmoose
I'm having a lot of remorse having returned that bike. I'm contemplating calling them back and having them mount wider tires on it, reducing air pressure and maybe even getting that stem if I still need it. I think bike adjustment, and the previous mods will make this bike handle this terrain - I just wish I had one with this set up to try first.
.
@ccand51997 YES- you just described what happened last week. my buddy on his heavier Mt Bike had an overall faster ride due to dropping me on downhills like a hot potato. He is getting skinny tires as we speak and is going to stick with that set up.
I agree a front suspension is needed- have you seen the new Specialized Diverge? It has a small shock in the stem. It also takes wide tires (One major limitation to the Jamis- I think 42c was widest it takes maybe even less).
I’m thinking hard about this bike b/c it is ready to go with little or no mods needed to tackle these Rugged AF roads.
bottom line: either I need to do what you’ve done with a light Mt Bike or add wider tires and a fork to a gravel bike which is available now standard on the Divergent.
@Dino Sore Yes- that’s what I was running, but I don’t like being limited in width on the Jamis. I weigh 177 and like your thoughts on tubeless and low pressure. Hopefully with the shock in the stem if I buy that bike I can keep a little more air in the tire for speed on flats.
thanks- all great suggestions from you guys- helping me think through this before I drop a lot of cash.
TrailRunnah wrote:thanks- all great suggestions from you guys- helping me think through this before I drop a lot of cash.