Loading…
NoCoGreg wrote:Per the periodic table, aluminum is a more reactive metal than iron yet most people are more concerned with corrosion (rust) with steel frames.
Here's a lengthy analysis of an aluminum bicycle frame which failed. The key takeaway IMHO is that corrosion inside of the bottom bracket area was a major contributor to the failure.
The key components (again IMHO) for the corrosion were:
1. The bike was used in a humid SALINE environment.
2. The inside of the tubes were not treated/protected.
Also note there were no signs of corrosion on the exterior of the tubes.
There's also a bunch of manufacturing details which are highlighted as contributing factors to the failure, but I would bet that if the bottom bracket area of the frame had been treated with a rust inhibitor (Frame Saver, LPS-3, Boe Shield, WD-40 or other) then the failure would not have occurred or at least would have taken much longer.
Here's the link...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232410562_Analysis_of_the_cracking_causes_in_an_aluminium_alloy_bike_frame
Zurichman wrote:
NoCoGreg I plan on getting my Tamland stripped down over the winter and get some kind of frame saver put on the inside. I think I would rule out WD-40 of the other three I have heard of frame saver and Boe shield but not LPS-3. Of these 3 is one better than the other two?
Thanks
Zman
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.