Loading…
RideWithPride wrote:Between the GravelKing SS vs Rene Herse knobby of the same size & width, which has more on road grip and which has better of road grip? One would assume the SK on dirt would have the most grip of the three but probably last on the road? What about the others?
RideWithPride wrote:What are tires would be similar to the GravelKing SS and a theoretical Rene Herse semi-slick? Thinking 38mm or 44mm RH slicks with a front semi-slick.. Oh I didn't realize your OP question. Answer is simple WTB Byway. I've had those for 2500 miles previous to the GravelKing SS. I actually feel the Byway are more supple (normal casing - not SG2). The RR tested for the Byway was the SG2 casing - I don't notice the GK SS any different in RR.
@RideWithPride the Bontrager GR1s I've repeated have been a pleasant surprise are that way in part because they don't have that on/off all/nothing characteristic of the slick center or pronounced center ridge tires. I consider them a save your money with no compromises alternative to a Schwalbe G One All Around and perfect middle ground between a slick tire and the Rene Hearse knobby tires I have.
This past weekend I did a 76 mi ride with a friend who's got same size G Ones covering pavement, gravel, single track and some sandy pathways. Who won a long cost downhill on smooth pavement was about the tuck. They seemed very comparable as far as rolling resistance. The way the knobs differ from center to edge makes them less prone to packing than that Schwalbe model.
It's noting against the Schwalbe as much as I found some clear advantages with the RH knobby tires having me more willing to pay the price.
I do believe Byways might last longer. The GR1 are dual compound and that can be nice but they wear faster. My nephew and a friend with GR1 both brought up the wear but in about same breath admitted the sticker outer rubber has advantages. I inflate them where dust or water shows I'm riding mostly on the center harder rubber, and they're plenty supple that way.
smoothmoose wrote:. Oh I didn't realize your OP question. Answer is simple WTB Byway. I've had those for 2500 miles previous to the GravelKing SS. I actually feel the Byway are more supple (normal casing - not SG2). The RR tested for the Byway was the SG2 casing - I don't notice the GK SS any different in RR.
YMMV or YRRMV. Not much love on this forum for the Byway. I'll say I've only run the 700x40 (38mm measured) Byway. My riding buddy has the 650x47 Byways and agree, he's had similar issues mentioned above. He's the same weight (150lbs) as me. Again my Byway lasted 2500miles - the front probably had another 800miles, but I like to swap out both tires to try news ones.
Everyone here seems to hem and haws about the BRR website results. I went from GK slick > Byway > GK SS (all light casings 700x38/40) and noticed no perceivable difference in RR - nor did I noticed sudden uptick or downtick in PRs, etc. What I did notice a difference is suppleness and the WTB light casing wins for me.
And back to the original OP question. I don't think RH would do a semi slick. Their philosophy is their semi-knobbie is designed to work as a semi-slick and as off-road knobbie in one tire - that's why I think it's an interesting tire and would likely be the next one I try.
RideWithPride wrote:Yup, those tires were announced like 3 weeks ago.
RideWithPride wrote:Between the GravelKing SS vs Rene Herse knobby of the same size & width, which has more on road grip and which has better of road grip? One would assume the SK on dirt would have the most grip of the three but probably last on the road? What about the others?
The GK SK also corners very well on pavement. Feels more like a slick than a treaded tire, and I have more confidence in it than the RH. Only notice the difference if I ride the same turns back to back on slicks and the SK. It also feels less draggy under power than the RH.
I have not ridden an SS yet but I would bet it rides even more like a slick than the SK.
On dirt the RH knobby definitely has more grip than the SK, except on pure hardpack, or maybe a bit of sand over hardpack. The looser the dirt, the better the RH be for cornering and drive/braking.
shiggy wrote:
The RH knobbies have plenty of road grip. I have cornered on them as if I was riding slicks. I may not have been cornering as fast but there was no squirm or other drama.
The GK SK also corners very well on pavement. Feels more like a slick than a treaded tire, and I have more confidence in it than the RH. Only notice the difference if I ride the same turns back to back on slicks and the SK. It also feels less draggy under power than the RH.
I have not ridden an SS yet but I would bet it rides even more like a slick than the SK.
On dirt the RH knobby definitely has more grip than the SK, except on pure hardpack, or maybe a bit of sand over hardpack. The looser the dirt, the better the RH be for cornering and drive/braking.
@RideWithPride and @stu The Bontrager GR1 are a contender for 40 mm, don't break the bank, and have the satisfaction guarantee. They are very predictable and have some edge or leaned over prowess I don't feel the consistent little knobs the Schwalbe have. Riding with others having the Schwalbe and Panaracer, no one's coasting ahead of me. I've made several purchases thinking of the Bontrager satisfaction policy but ended up liking the products.
In my circle of associates who do this sort of riding there seems to be a consensus that knobby style RH and the Challenge are worth the $80-$90ish premium but not all.
On flats, I got forced over a bunch of shattered glass with the Bontrager and feel any tire would have had some cuts in same way but the rear that took damage sealed up fine.