Loading…
FlashBazbo wrote:There are counties in the U.S. that have no gravel roads at all. It's easier to find a mountain bike trail. For these people, eventually, it will be more trouble to transport their bike to gravel than they think it's worth. For a lot of them, not all, gravel biking is a fad. It won't die for that group, but it will become much like mountain biking is,\n \nDing ding ding. Good luck finding a proper gravel bike in Tampa. There's no gravel around here. I think marketing them as all road bikes makes a lot more sense.
shoota wrote: Ding ding ding. Good luck finding a proper gravel bike in Tampa. There's no gravel around here. I think marketing them as all road bikes makes a lot more sense.
.... the title of the thread. My first gravel race was 10 years ago, and during my road racing career that began in the late 80's we used to 50/50 paved/gravel to make training harder. I think a "fad" by definition requires this thing we're all talking about to be short-lived, not going for a decade +. Nubster wrote:3 years after this thread was started...yeah...boy...that gravel grinding fad...man that burned out quick huh?
ridemagnetic wrote:I think you're getting fad confused with trend. The disco era was a trend, however godawful as it is people still listen to it. If gravel this or that was really a fad it would have died off in 2009 and participation rate wouldn't be still growing at this point.
The easiest way to categorize a fad is one word: short-lived. ... Trends have a much longer lifespan than fads. In fact, they can continue to be fashionable for years and even decades. The primary difference between a trend and a fad is that trends have the potential to be long-term influencers on the market.