Loading…
drwelby wrote:The FSA cranks won't fit your bottom bracket because the spindle is too big - 30mm. Same with the Rotor cranks. But you should be able fit the Sugino cranks which use 24mm spindles. You probably have to change your bearings to the Shimano BB90 set.
Old Guy wrote:
Great info coming in from every where...which is great!
If nothing else, we are all sure learning a lot about Cranks and Gear Ratios! lol
The Front Derailleur has been mentioned a few times, and I have changed mine, from the stock brazed on one.
I have all Sram components on my bike, including the Front Derailleur which easily slides up and down, to adjust for any Crank.
That problem solved.
Here is a question for you guys.
Like WTF....is wrong with the Bike companies?
WHY is it soooooo insanely difficult to run any gears that you want or need on your bike, without re inventing the Wheel?
Like come on guys.....we are talking about "Bicycles" here! LOL
Two wheels....some pedals a crank and a few gears.
How difficult can it be, to make Hills easy to conquer?
Has No One out there....got....the Simple Fix?
We keep going around and around...yet.....No One has actually DONE THIS YET?
No One out there.....has all the answers in how they did it?
I thought that just buying a 46 x 30 was going to be a simple Fix....I was all set, to just buy one.....and change back to an 11x34 Cassette and be done with it.
But.....every time that we come up with the answer....we then learn.....that the Crank will not fit!
Once again.....WTF?
If we can do Engine swaps .....by putting a 350 Chevy into a VW Bug.....or they have kits to drop a 350 easily into a Jeep.....then why the hell.....can we not decide.....the Best method and the best ways for putting Bigger Gears...onto a simple "Bicycle"?
HILLS and Insane Grades......are an issue for every rider at various times......sooooo......why have the Bike Companies or Shimano and Sram not come up with easy Swaps.....in order to make anyone and any bike.... a Hill Climbing Champ?
What will FIT....in order to make this work????
WHO makes something......where do you Buy it....who sells it.....and does it work???
What are the Cross Bikes using?
No.....I do not want to go Single!
No.....I do not want to go Triple!
So.....lets not even mention those Options.
I have a BB90 .....that will not change!
So.....what 46x30 Crank is going to Fit my Trek?
It seems as if the FSA is not going to work.
So.....what will?
We are talking about "Bicycles" LOL......it should not be this difficult!
There is a Crank and there is a Cassette.
What combination is going to work and "FIT"?
Going to a 48 Crank .......is No Big Change....from a 50 Crank.
46X30.......is what I am looking for.
Does anyone ....have the Know ow, Skill and Experience .....to make this work?
Better yet......has anyone done this yet?
It should not be this Frustrating! LOL
NoCoGreg wrote:
And along the same theme of "they won't work"...
Mountain FD's which are designed for smaller chainrings do not necessarily have the same cable pull as their road cousins. So depending upon which brand and model of shifter and FD indexing may not work. The SRAM 10spd road and mountain shifters and derailleurs are compatible but as others pointed out SRAM changed the cable pull for 11spd mountain shifters. And what about Shimano? Their road and mountain gear is simply incompatible.
So for an 11spd drivetrain using a 46t chainring, a SRAM setup with 11spd road shifters, 10spd mtn derailleurs, and 11spd cassette (SRAM or Shimano) should work. This setup would also allow one to swap to a road FD if shifting on the 46t was problematic. The one limitation of the SRAM 10spd RD is a 36t max cog.
Cheers,
Greg
Old Guy wrote:WHO makes something......where do you Buy it....who sells it.....and does it work???
What are the Cross Bikes using?
dangle wrote:\n \nSorry, that's wrong. BB90, BB86, and BSA external cups all have the bearings in the same place. Trek is a big OEM but they're not getting Shimano and Sram to make them slightly wider cranks. Check the Problem Solvers bottom bracket compatibility chart PDF. \n \nThere are teeny bearings that let you run 30mm spindles in BB86 shells but they have terrible durability problems. The bearings are just too small for the loads.
Incorrect. It's because the spindle is only 86mm wide and the Trek bottom bracket is 90mm wide. If the bottom bracket were 86mm wide (like a more common BB86 meant for 24mm spindles that are 86mm wide), there's easily bearings to cram a 30mm spindle in there. It just means the ball bearings are a little smaller.
Skldmark wrote:There are teeny bearings that let you run 30mm spindles in BB86 shells but they have terrible durability problems. The bearings are just too small for the loads. -- but remember OP has a BB90/net-mould Trek. I don't believe there is a bearing for 30mm crank spindle to fit this frame.
![[composite-copy]](https://cdn-cyclingtips.pressidium.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/composite-copy.jpg)
ljsmith wrote:Old Guy, I wouldn't be so quick to completely blame the bike industry for your lack of choices. They will make and sell anything if they think they can make a profit. The gravel market is still small, though it is growing. To make good profit the parts really need to be useable on road bikes also. Component companies make most of their money off OEM sales, so unless bike companies want to spec a lot of bikes with a certain part, then it is unlikely that they will make it just for aftermarket sales. Unfortunately most roadies are much more skeptical of new things than mountain bikers. I still regularly hear roadies complaining about compact cranks, disc brakes, tires larger than 25c, carbon handlebars etc. In the mountain bike world people are ready to embrace anything new, but in the roadie world tradition and myths about what is fast cloud what they think about new things. You can show up to the trail for a mountain ride with just about any bike and any equipment and its cool. Try showing up for a road ride on a disc brake bike, with 35c tires, mountain pedals/shoes, wearing a hydration pack and you will be made to feel like a moron.
NoCoGreg wrote:
"True" cross bikes use single and double cranksets with narrow ranges. The doubles sold on cross bikes are 46/36 or 50/34.
Yes this can work and as Dangle point out, you have solutions.
A good LBS can order and install all of the parts and make it work. The mechanics at the shop may have additional solutions and options.
Skldmark wrote:PF 86/92 and PF30 bearing have nylon sleeve added to their dimension. Subtract that (4mm) and they measure the same as BB90 or BB30,respectively. 37+4=41, 42+4=46. 👍
moe53 wrote:This thread makes my head hurt.
Old Guy, I remember the days of 52-42 and 12-17 straight blocks, I still have some, lol. You would have loved that!
Seriously, maybe you can adjust your riding routes to have less climbing until you gain some fitness and you have the right gearing. I agree that the manufacturers will start to make smaller cranksets in the near future, it is already starting. A few years ago the gravel tire selection was really limited, now it seems like every week or so a new tire comes out.
More coffee? lol!